Consent takes equal accountability, right?

Do not male/female animals share an equal consent accountability with each other. And are they, compared to humans, not more honest about the sexual process that takes place? Certainly. The interactive male/female arrangement consists of a mutual accountability level shared by two consenting adults. Humans are now below animals in this respect, especially due to feminism’s influence, not prior. A man and a woman’s equal status as adults cancels out any need for permission.

Also Read: Marital R*pe: A tale of consensual S*x

Otherwise, one of the two participants is granted less accountability for their mutual involvement in the process and equal participation in the act. Strange how what some call equality has conveniently made women less equal to men from the past. This, as in the case of the sex act, spells entrapment.

Have you ever thought about different languages and how people communicate outside of the spoken word? Well, sex is a species-wide language of its own, well-communicated through sexual stimulation and body language. However, dishonesty is conveyed by many modern women. And that dishonesty is held against the receptor of their sexual/sensory transmission rather than the deceiver as was the case in the past.

Whether speaking the same verbal language or not, women communicate their sexuality very effectively. However, women who do speak the same language often dishonestly communicate their sexuality too. They are guilty of false promises, as their ill-intended actions were accurately termed in the past. Are we more apt to honestly convey sex (stimulation) to someone we know doesn’t speak the same language as we do, knowing full-well what we are communicating to them? If that is the only means of communication, are we as likely to summon sex if our intentions are not sincere? Do we hold those who can not communicate in any other way as accountable for the disingenuous actions of another? Is not summoning sex past the point of consent expressed by the one summoning it?

Do men in prison not wanting to have sex openly express their sexuality to other men and then cry rape due to the summoned results that occur? Are they not held to more consent accountability for their actions (equal participation) in the sexual process than are women with men?

What it boils down to is the whole intention is to defy men and their sexuality, disregarding their sexual stimulation and entrapping them per law by it. Women knew better than to do this in the past consent when they were not only more considerate of men but held accountable for their actions. Their culpability was responsibly measured by what they wore and how they presented themselves.

After all, it is initiating sexual stimulation (conveyed consent) per a means (visual) women have always used in their sexual interactions and direct communication with men. Porn, prostitution, and women’s lingerie all attest to this. They are just no longer honest about it or held accountable as they were in the past for it. Women’s sexual abuse of men is not only allowed but encouraged due to popular misandry. And with women using practically any means possible to attack men, weaponizing the female’s sexuality is a very potent means available for women to do it. Many innocent men are entrapped by the female’s false promises as well as later by false accusations.

Sex is seen as evil, so men are less innocent due to sex being a need to them more than it is to women. Besides testosterone determining the male’s sex-drive compared to the female’s, admission to this branding by women themselves is evident by the old cliche commonly expressed by women “Sex, that’s all men ever want” with a negative/dirty stigma attached to this ‘disgusting’ characteristic exclusive to men.