Many feminists today don’t want equality they are misandrists as the points I will write below will not be said by someone who wants equality. They are hypocritical as they support only those who fulfill their political agenda if they are wrong too!!
“K*ll all men”
Is this phrase non-misandric? Someone is just saying to wipe out 50% of the population based on their gender. Is this a safe place for boys to be born? Should boys be birthed in this environment where every man is a potential rapist and so on… Below are a few examples of such parallel statements. Is this not prejudiced to say Boys are rejected items, all violence is male generate as men are the victim of domestic too. See the recent Johnny Depp case. There are many false rape and harassment cases against men and they are being raped and harassed too. There is a load of terms like “Men are Trash” the list is endless.
Remember what Amber Heard said to Johnny Depp.”
“Tell the world, Johnny Depp, tell them, I, Johnny Depp, a man, I am a victim too of domestic violence, and see how many people believe or side with you.” – Amber Heard
“The future is female”
The famous quote “The future is female” is paraphrasing a piece by Sally Gearhart.
Her three-part plan is simple:
I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future.
II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture.
III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
In the same talk she claims: “The real danger is in the phenomenon of male-bonding,…”
She goes on to say:
“(if) men were reduced in number, the threat would not be so great and the placement of species responsibility with the female would be assured.”
These are not the words of a group that wants equality.
“Toxic Masculinity”
Many reap the benefits of men and their masculine attributes but condemn masculinity without due credit for the good that men have accomplished. For every male criminal, there are thousands of male heroes.
Read about it here: Masculinity: world fails to see the good in
“I drink male tears”
This, to put it simply, means that one makes men cry for pleasure. It doesn’t involve the use of violence or romance rather than it uses annoyance, trolling, and other internet methods. Those who would use it in this regard tend to be careless of male emotions, are insensitive, and believe in the negative stereotypes of men yet they seem to admire men who embody such a stereotype and harm any male that doesn’t fit it.
E.g. This onlyfans subscriber just gave me 10 grand and I told him how stupid he was and he was totally like, crying! Oh boy I love to drink male tears! It is also used to imply that one believes one will win in a debate against a man on gender issues to the point that they will make them “cry”. Meaning they are extremely sure of themselves when promoting the female, usually feminist, perspective in debate and should they ever lose, the shock on their faces makes fascinating viewing!
“Masculinity so fragile”
The term “Masculinity so fragile” is a common way to critique inflexible or conventional ideas of masculinity that are susceptible to being threatened or challenged by perceived gender norm violations. The phrase alludes to the notion that certain people who have such rigid ideas of what masculinity is could react angrily to anything they see as undermining or challenging their masculinity.
The word became well-known as a hashtag on social media to promote conversations on toxic masculinity and the pressure society puts on males to fit into preconceived notions. It draws attention to the harmful effects of toxic masculinity, which can prevent men from expressing their feelings, asking for help when they need it, or participating in activities considered “feminine” out of a fear of appearing weak or less macho.
Critics contend that this idea enforces a narrow and antiquated definition of what it means to be a male, which limits individual choice and promotes damaging gender stereotypes. People who advocate for breaking conventional masculinity frequently urge for more emotionally expressive and gender-inclusive attitudes that allow people of any gender to be themselves without fear of scorn or criticism.
“Mansplaining, manspreading, manterrupting”
“Mansplaining, manterrupting” “Man explaining” (shortened) and “man interrupted” (shortened). These words are used to stop a man from talking and making points that are against the women who uses it. The logic of the points made by the man is irrelevant. Practically anything anyone says could need to be “explained” or could “interrupt” another’s thinking thus the idea that these terms have any descriptive value regarding “the way one makes their point” is a lie.
“Manspreading” A term that started around 2013-2014, describing the way a man sits tends to take up more space than a woman in a public space. This has been scientifically explained due to the shape of the pelvis giving a different angle and rotation of the leg bone for men requiring them to use more space. Feminists, at the time, believed sitting in such a way was for non-physical reasons and was proof of the existence of “male privilege” as “privileged people would take up more space without thinking”. It has been said that feminists today have stopped believing this, however, many anti-feminists aren’t convinced. The fact that the term “manspreading” was used as much as it was for many years after 2013-2014 by feminists does demonstrate how desperate feminism is to find phenomena to justify their anti-male ideas and how difficult it is to get them to realise that they have made a mistake.
“Male, pale and stale”
“Male, pale and stale” A term used by intersectional feminists to criticise an organisation for having too many old, white and male people working for it. It starts with the idea that an age, race and sex disparity alone in an organisation alone is enough to accuse it of agist, racist or sexist behaviour. It then promotes the idea that only men can be sexist, only white people can be racists, and agism can only affect women and not men thus the anti-male, anti-aged male and anti-whitism is slur “male, pale and stale” is acceptable. The organisations that are criticised in this way are always ones that make large sums of money or have power. The prison population, sewage workers or brick layer organisations don’t get criticised this way as in having no power, feminists have no interest in making “equal”. In a way, the fact this term is used proves intersectional feminism is ultimately about gaining power and enriching the people who believe it and has no interest in “equality” in ways it matters (say human rights) or discovering new truths about humanity.
“Oh no, he committed su*cide.
Shame… we tried so hard to help.”
Special Thanks to Anti-Feminism Australia Facebook Group for helping me in editing the article and providing content.
I am Vivek Singh owner and publisher of newsofx.com. I am a journalist by profession. I did my Bachelor’s in Journalism and Mass Communication from Amity University Jharkhand and my Master’s in the same from Central University of Jharkhand grabbing the gold medal.
I am a Men’s Rights Activist, International Men’s Day and World Day of the Boy Child India coordinator, and Global Media coordinator for both of these days.
Discover more from NEWSOFX
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
14 thoughts on “The Feminist Approach to Men’s Mental Health By Using The Terms Like – “K*ll all men,” “I drink male tears,” and “Male, pale and stale” etc.”