Sydney Sweeney and the Theater of Liberal Fa***sm by (Vivek Singh: Headings+Levin Yoav: Body)

When beauty, wh*teness, and individuality are recoded as cr*mes, we are no longer in a culture of tolerance but in a regime of ideological control.

The recent targeting of actress Sydney Sweeney highlights not only the contradictions of progressive ideology but also the selective wea*onization of identity politics. What should have been a conversation about talent and personal freedom has instead turned into an ideological spectacle, where attractiveness, political alignment, and even the color of a pet dog are grounds for public sh*ming. This incident reflects the broader distortions of postmodern feminism and progressivism, which often collapse into contradictions and ultimately reproduce the very bigotry they claim to fight.

Also Read: Females in The Fantasy Land: The Ages

Being Attractive as a Crime

Sweeney has faced backlash simply for being “s*xy” and conventionally attractive. This reveals a paradox: contemporary feminism preaches body positivity and se*ual liberation, yet when a woman embodies these traits outside the san*tioned ideological script, she becomes a target. The same cultural elite that champions “liberation” for some women condemns others for the very same qualities. This is not liberation — it is ideological policing disguised as progress.

Political Alignment as Guilt

Another reason for the attacks is Sweeney’s suspected Republican leanings. In the current progressive climate, political affiliation has become a moral category: being conservative is cast as inherently suspect, if not outright criminal. This is a clear vi*lation of the pluralistic principles that liberal democracy was meant to uphold. The hypocrisy is obvious: progressives demand tolerance for all identities — except for political ones that challenge their d*minance.

Jeans vs. Genes: The American Eagle Campaign

Even Sweeney’s American Eagle jeans advertisement was weaponized against her, as though mainstream modeling for a clothing brand were a symbol of opp*ession. Here, the wordplay of “jeans vs. genes” is telling. Progressives who preach acceptance of diversity end up sti*matizing her natural appearance — her “genes” — while demonizing her commercial work. This shows the incoherence of their critique: they rail against capitalism while simultaneously consuming and profiting from it.

Must Read: The “Hawk Tuah” Girl [Men’s Rights Advocate View] – 1

Wh*teness as Original S*n

Perhaps the most disturbing element is the treatment of Sweeney’s r*ce. Being white is increasingly cast as a form of guilt, as though skin color itself were a cr*me. To attack someone on the basis of their wh*teness is r*cism, no less than att*cking someone for being Bl*ck, As*an, or L*tino. Progressive ideology has replaced equality with inversion: instead of abolishing racial hierarchies, it has created new ones, institutionalizing resentment in the name of “justice.”

The Absurdity of the White Dog

The fact that Sweeney’s dog was mocked for being white shows how far the bigotry has metastasized. When even the color of a pet becomes political ammunition, we are no longer dealing with reason but with ideological pathology. This is not justice or liberation — it is the parody of both, exposing the descent of progressive discourse into irrationality.

The Postmodern Contradiction

At the heart of this episode lies the broader contradiction of postmodern progressivism: it declares that all identities must be affirmed, but in practice, it only affirms those identities that fit its ideological script. It champions “body positivity,” but only for those who conform politically. It denounces rac*sm, but legitimizes hatred toward whites. It preaches liberation, but polices women who express se*uality outside the approved narrative.

Toward True Equality

If equality is to mean anything, it must apply across all categories — gender, race, ethnicity, and political affiliation. The persecution of Sydney Sweeney shows that progressivism is not about equality but about selective enforcement. At NewsofX, we support genuine equality, where no individual is dem*nized for being white, B*ack, conservative, liberal, m*le, f*male, or anything else. Bigotry cannot be fought by inverting it; prejudice cannot be cured by creating new targets.

Must Read: Dear Men, Never Date…

Conclusion

The Sydney Sweeney case is more than a celebrity controversy — it is a cultural case study in of feminist, progressive, postmodern, and woke liberal fa***sm. What we see is not freedom of expression or pluralism but the enforcement of ideological conformity through sh*ming, inversion, and double standards. Feminism and progressivism, once framed as movements of liberation, now often operate as instruments of control, where attractiveness becomes a crime, political dissent becomes guilt, and ra*ial identity becomes original s*n.

This is the essence of liberal fa***sm: a system that cloaks coercion in the language of freedom, that weaponizes identity to enforce uniformity, and that punishes deviation not through open censorship but through cultural sti*matization. By policing s*xuality, politics, race, and even the color of a pet dog, progressivism reveals itself as an authoritarian moral order masquerading as justice.

True equality cannot be achieved by inverting prejudice or by fragmenting society into hierarchies of victimhood. It can only be realized by upholding universal principles: that no woman should be targeted for her beauty, no citizen for their political affiliation, no person for their race. The treatment of Sweeney exposes not her guilt but the hollowness of the ideology that seeks to shame her.

The Takeaway

What we see in the targeting of Sydney Sweeney is not just hypocrisy, nor merely cultural double standards. It reflects the deeper dynamic of liberal fa***sm — an ideological system that dresses itself in the language of tolerance, equality, and progress, while enforcing conformity through shaming, inversion, and manufactured outrage. Under this regime, the same qualities that were once celebrated — beauty, femininity, even whiteness as a neutral fact of identity — are re-coded as crimes if they do not serve the ideological script.

This is why the attacks feel both absurd and menacing: they are not about Sweeney as an individual, but about disciplining society into accepting the new orthodoxy. Liberal fa***sm thrives on such rituals of denunciation, where the accused is guilty not for what they did but for what they represent.

Sydney Sweeney’s only “cr*me” was being beautiful, successful, and politically inconvenient. That was enough to turn her into a target in today’s climate of liberal fa***sm. What should have been celebrated — talent, hard work, confidence — was twisted into proof of guilt.

This is how the system works: it shames beauty while preaching body positivity, condemns whiteness while calling itself anti-r*cist, and punishes dissent while pretending to champion diversity. The hypocrisy is the point.

If equality means anything, it must mean one standard for all. Until then, every attack like this doesn’t just expose one actress — it exposes the authoritarian face behind the mask of progress.

Vivek Singh

I am Vivek Singh owner and publisher of newsofx.com. I am a journalist by profession. I did my Bachelor’s in Journalism and Mass Communication from Amity University Jharkhand and my Master’s in the same from Central University of Jharkhand grabbing the gold medal.
I am a Men’s Rights Activist, International Men’s Day and World Day of the Boy Child India coordinator, and Global Media coordinator for both of these days.