Dating Dynamics: Dating Up or Down is a value assessment displacing Personal Attachment, Love, and Affection

Dating Dynamics: Dating or marrying ‘up or down’ was never a term in the past when love and affection meant something in forming relationships between men and women. Why? Could it be due to when what defines women’s independence is combined with misandry? Financial incentives compensate for women’s hatred, otherwise, men are not good enough or worth it? Why else is this value assessment null and void when two members of the same sex form a relationship? Do the values we used to apply to heterosexual relationships only now exist in homosexual relationships? Something is certainly amiss.

Only misandric fools claim women are more picky when it comes to mate selection than are men. Get a comprehensive understanding of the human species, including adaptation and biology, and you will know different. Women select for certain features in men just as men select for certain features in women. But a mutation arrives when attached to these mate preferences are common stigmas held by a poor female character developed in our culture when applied to their mate selection.

The common declaration, “Nice guys finish last with women,” is self-evident as well as descriptive of modern-day women’s selection process. You think that just maybe women are looking for the wrong things in men in their ‘special selective’ process and that this may be due to their poor values and that they don’t have anything of quality themselves to offer decent men? Yup.

Qualities women seek in men are attached to their modern-day values as women. They select in men a poorer quality because they are themselves a poorer quality of women. If they based their selection on attraction, love, and affection (without a money assessment attached), they would select a better quality of men who would not otherwise go to waste in today’s society.

Dating ‘up or down’ (Dating Dynamics) is an unacceptable, sick term used due to poor values applying to a man and a woman getting together. The reference is so stupid as to say all men dated down in the past due to a financial assessment applied to one’s personal value. Again, homosexual relationships don’t qualify as dating up or down so how is such a term justified applying to men and women getting together?

Genetics are attached to money via men. Yes, this is why men had money in the past and women didn’t. Resources, later converted to government currency, evolved that way. If men are to accept Equal Employment Opportunity and have this value attachment extracted from their existence, then women must accept these terms they have forced upon men and society. Otherwise, we are experiencing another female double standard at men’s and society’s expense.

As I have stressed before, was this the implementation of a very effective socio-genetically influenced form of population control with complete disregard for men and our human rights? Although creating fewer in number, does not its implementation also alter us, per a selective result, to a lower type of human being?

[Author’s note: As an effective educator, I teach people to think and to think for themselves. Part of this process is providing them the necessary tools to do it–the main one being the truth. It is vital that we apply this intellectual process to the men’s equality cause.]