We know by the common knowledge that nice guys finish last with women, especially now due to the poorer quality of modern-day women. But men themselves lack values that respect good men too. [A good man is not defined by how he treats women but by how he treats everyone, men and women alike.] The poorer quality of man corresponds to those who cater to, and encourage, a lesser quality of character in women. Men, groomed from boyhood to serve women as to define their manhood, are sculpted to fit as the male counterpart.
This common ground, as to how men are developed from boyhood to serve as thugs and disposable pawns for women is a standard that exists on both sides of the political fence whether it be republican/conservative or democrat/liberal. Both harbor the cultural female bias commonly referred to as chivalry (traditional misandry) and feminism (the modern version) with a mutation now that incorporates the two versions. Political divisions only exist in the type, generally-speaking conservatives–chivalry and liberals–feminism. A general reference to the effect is gynocentrism, but a broken-down descriptive reference is chivalry upon which premise feminism and the resulting consequences have been built. The effect applied to men is pussy-whipped, with a popular modern-day term also describing the effect as “Happy wife, happy life.” The not-so-hidden message refers to the modern female who must be patronized to have a tolerable life shared with her OR ELSE suffer the consequences per a very corrupt court system that caters to serving women designed by the same misandric and gynocentric conditions described above.
But along with this misandric mutation of the past and present have come extremes that contribute to an even worse human condition than many realize, not just applied to men but to society in general. For example, a polite man is often deemed ‘weak’ or a ‘pussy’ if he is polite to another man. Yet, the same man if polite to a woman is not negatively judged. If he treats everyone with the same consideration he is often considered gay and out of the running by both men and women. A double prejudice is applied to him. What I see now happening as the result is that men overcompensate who do not want to be seen as ‘weak’ or ‘gay’ and are now inclined to express a more ‘exaggerated’ or violent form of masculinity in an apparent attempt to ward off any such presumed associations.
Thus, when masculinity is being attacked, as it is, we see new social dynamics that we have never seen so exaggerated. Extreme contrasts are evident. The new alpha/beta male designation is evidence of this. The divisionary effect is just another bigotry version of shaming men as to be superior/inferior to each other. This also allows women to condemn men for the results of their poor character, derogatorily deeming ‘lesser’ men to be involuntarily celibate (InCels). The new designation only ‘appropriately’ fits due to the poor quality of females that has developed seeking her poorly-formulated selectivity in men. The condition didn’t exist in the past to support the stereo-typic title of InCel. [Are we setting men up to be condemned either way? One is either a ‘loser’ InCell and beta or a ‘cool’ violent alpha/criminal type.] Programs and movies, loaded with feminist propaganda for decades, now portray extreme violence at levels never before expressed.
But are we also missing something here in this analogy? We sure as hell are! Women, due to a lack of good character, are not necessarily seeking the wrong kind of men, they are seeking men for the wrong reasons–out of mere greed and selfishness–which includes GOOD men. As sociological parasites, many women are seeking men for their financial assets (without love) and using men, then taking their assets, including their children, and enslaving them through alimony and child support with the government serving as an accomplice incentivising women to do it.
Where is all this leading us? Certainly further from our past but to an unforeseen future that we at least know in foresight is absent of love, ethical standards and kindness–not equal justice for all. Keep in mind that through this process are genetic ties to an environmental influence that screens out the good qualities in humanity.
Alan Millard continues to be a prominent men’s equality advocate since the early ’80s. He began writing his first book, Equality: A Man’s Claim, in the Spring of 1983. He has been thereafter continually affiliated with the major men’s rights organizations and has contributed many articles, radio, and some television broadcasts. His work includes research conducted through his graduate and doctoral coursework and knowledge acquired through his independent studies and colleague associations as a university professor. He heads the group Men’s Equality on Facebook. He is the author of three books addressing men’s equality concerns. His most recent book, A Flaw From Within: How Women’s Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society, is available through Amazon.
1 thought on “Nice Guys Finish Last with Men too”