Women Needing ‘Protection’: Bogus Female Victim Status

The idea of women needing protection more than men is not only what leads to favouritism toward women but what ‘justifies’ sex bias, prejudice and discrimination against men. After all, who do women supposedly need protection from? Men, right? This narrative is sex-bigotted from the start. It is the key component to the female’s victim card and common female favouritism throughout society. Men are pitted against other men for women. Unfortunately, many police officers perform this bigoted role as bullies and thugs for women. And worse, the bigotry is further supported by modern laws, with women held less accountable to men.

Also Read: A Flaw From Within few Consciously Realize Exists

Due only to men being groomed from boyhood to serve women, women need protection from men less than vice versa. Women tend to want ‘protection’ from men who have done something to violate men. It’s more the case that men need to be safeguarded due to women and their misandric behaviour rather than pitted against each other as blind accomplices for women. This male self-hate has been used by women to wield injustice using unethical men (dedicated to female servitude) to do their dirty work, including discriminatory laws made to their discretion. (This is self-evident in the political arena now with extremely sex-biased laws made–e.g. VAWA, Title IX, and others, including redefining rape to purposely criminalize men via their sexuality.) Chivalry and being a gentleman is the foundation culminating in the extreme injustices we now experience through feminism. As a result, this sickness has been applied to movies, education, laws, sentencing, social policy, customary social practice and politics as well as to the mating/dating process and all the chivalrous inequities that encompass.

For example, since women complain about men’s approach and get men in trouble for it, as men are predominantly subjected to all the rejection, ridicule, and sexual harassment charges involved, it’s high time that ONLY women assume that role until laws can be changed back to some form of civility. Discriminatory sex laws too have been sculpted to persecute and entrap men which never was the case in the past, contrasted especially now by women’s open sexual expression. Women need to not only accept equal accountability but now, with these sex-biased laws in place, take on most of the responsibility for mating/dating per the laws that they have imposed upon men. This will allow men to be safe from what women are commonly allowed to do to men per law and will help to keep men from persecution and common systemized abuse by women.

There are even men in the men’s equality effort who are still so ignorant and self-loathing as to abide by a credo that supports chivalry (extreme female bias and favouritism). They are frauds who, lacking self-respect, damage the effort as ‘gentlemen’–a term holding men to a chivalry bias favouring women, the self-hate differing from what is erroneously used as its female counterpart of ‘lady’. Being a lady has no such servitude obligation and favouritism regarding men. Gentleman is a mere front for ‘appropriate’ sex bias and self-hate amongst men in a servitude role to women, whereas being a lady has no reference applied to serving men. This culturalized sex bigotry needs to stop in order to have any foundation supporting men’s equality and a premise built upon equal justice for all.

2 thoughts on “Women Needing ‘Protection’: Bogus Female Victim Status”

Leave a Comment