“If I have children, I want five boys. Boys love their mothers, whereas girls can be so mean to each other.”: Adele Laurie Blue Adkins

In an old October 2011 interview with Vogue, Adele said, “I’ve always got on better with boys. Most of my friends are boys. Like, if I have children, I want five boys. Boys love their mothers, whereas girls can be so mean to each other.” Why did she say so? Today, when some women don’t want to carry a m*le f*tus, and they write, and I quote, “I will ab*rt every m*le f*tus I bear, I will live to ensure there are no m*re s*ns.” Why did Adele say so, and that too being a woman? I think she understood what I am talking about below, and many others don’t.

Also Read:
I’m raising two boys. I want ’em to feel powerful too [while] respecting women: Shakira
“They won’t be a gentleman because that makes them appear soft.”: Robyn Rihanna Fenty
Beta Male/White Knights: Making – Full Tutorial DIY At Home

Masculinity: the world fails to see the good in

Many reap the benefits of men and their masculine attributes but condemn masculinity without due credit for the good that men have accomplished. For every male cr*minal, there are thousands of male heroes.

We must first realize that men and women can’t replace each other. As creatures of Mother Earth and God, both s*xes are designed to exist in their own right but in complement to one another. Everything men do can’t be done as well by women, and much of what women do can’t be done as well by men. Men and women are equal but different—opposites that support each other. Men’s role in advancing society through technology applied to labor and agriculture, the military, mining, and occupations such as firefighters and police officers has been cherished. We use and depend on these technological advancements every day, yet we still condemn the source of their creation with no credit? Through the creation of a constitution, government, and just laws, engineering, and technology, men and masculinity advanced society.

Also Read: It’s so hypocritical that men’s masculinity is toxic for feminists but if it benefits them directly or indirectly then it isn’t

However, we must keep in mind that although men and women may have different roles when united, the roles of men and women must be equally shared when they separate, especially if children are involved, (including custody and support of children) because each parent takes on the tasks and responsibilities of the other–roles are split (of equal importance) pertaining to children and to equal physical custody shared by both parents.

In recent years, fatherless children have increased. This prevents children from receiving teaching from both parents and causes them to go the wrong way.

Fem*n*sm, a recent sociological c*ncer, was created and started spreading, breaking up families. It continues, recently taking the l*ves of many males through false accusations and keeping fathers away from their children, causing tremendous h*rm to men and to the healthy development of children. Laws are specifically designed to favor women and target men, hypocritically holding those who claim to be equal to men (women) less accountable.

When a man commits a crime like m*rder, r*pe, or expresses a**ression through war, masculinity is targeted and blamed under the premise that all masculinity is t*xic. However, all the pros of men and masculinity are exempt from this feminist assessment, and some of the negative assessments include normal male characteristics that feminists just don’t like (e.g., the male’s se*uality, commonly condemned or used by women to get what they want from men). The heroes portrayed in movies also show a**ression, vi*lence, and ambition unchecked by conscience. These are examples of t*xic masculinity. All that makes up t*xic masculinity (defined by feminists) is if the male identity doesn’t somehow benefit women. If there is no positive masculinity in the world, then t*xic masculinity will increase, as t*xic people (including t*xic femininity) will set the standard. No positive masculinity or positive femininity will exist to fight it either. Masculinity doesn’t always destroy by causing wars; it helps to defeat tyranny or dictatorships, often necessary in response through war. Also keep in mind that through men, masculinity is often used as a tool, if not by the government, by women, in which case men are pawns–this form of masculinity can be t*xic (e.g., chivalry). As for the economy, when a male becomes a thief, feminists attribute t*xic masculinity as the cause, but when economies grow, credit is either exempt or taken by women.

When men take foolish risks, it’s ‘t*xic masculinity’, but when they take heroic risks, often required by performing the duties of a police officer or firefighter, or in hazardous occupations required of a miner or logger, the credit is either unnoticed or taken away by feminists.


Discover more from NEWSOFX

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply