Sex is a vital need to men, important for their human male health. However, if sex is to be recognized as a male need this will allow it to be acknowledged as proof that women are able to tease and deprive men something they need just as if they were deprived food, oxygen or water or given token amounts to merely keep them alive but only if they abide as slaves to accommodate such oppressive terms. The exploitation of the male’s sexuality is demonstrated from women deliberately geting pregnant to purposely entrapping men into committing a crime per newly defined sex laws that target heterosexual men.
Also Read: A Flaw From Within few Consciously Realize Exists
Even in light of the one-way sexual power women possess over men, some have the audacity to claim that sex isn’t a need to men because they don’t die without it. So even if a person is living in misery, due to being deprived something necessary to resolve that condition, as long as this person’s other needs are met means that disqualifies what is necessary for their health from being a need? Women’s sexual power over men and men committing suicide due to sexual deprivation is in itself proof enough that sex is a need to men.
When real equality standards were represented by good character in both men and women, both equally shared their assets with each other, but as soon as women realized (were incentivized), due to a provided opportunity and a poor character harboring misandry to match, men were targeted (criminalized) and exploited through their sexuality.
The truth of the matter not only places a deposit applying to men’s fulfillment but applies a lack of accountability to women and negates women’s (feminists) claim that sex is a need to women too, which we all know is impossible given the skewed terms applied in practice. Women would not possess the sexual power over men if this were the case. And that is what’s at stake here. Being in denial of something so commonly used (and the discrepancy so evident) helps to keep this imbalance in women’s favor. In fact, if sex were not the priority of their needs men would be fine without women. They would not be criminalized for violating strict guidelines to which a prejudiced government holds men with women using their sexuality to criminalize men. Men are set up no less than is a dependent dog being poisoned through its food.
The priority of any organism/species is to reproduce, so of all needs sex is the priority. The male’s body will purposely go without food and water in priority of sex to copulate. Elk are known for starving to death during the mating season due to sexual opportunities available. Sex being the priority of all needs is well-demonstrated in women’s ability (exclusive power over men) to manipulate and control men (e.g. pussy power)! But again, to make sure that we don’t call it a need, although it is rated as one in the social sciences too, it’s necessary to not categorize it as a need in order to not threaten the female’s power (and a tremendous ego attached to it) and religious guidelines that men are not to be ‘weak’ and succumb to ‘temptation’. Why not? Why should men not fulfill their basic needs? It even gets worse from the religious viewpoint in that sex is only for reproduction. These nut-jobs with their sexual hang-ups don’t even think a man should have any sexual release even via masturation either. What a farce. In fact, humans are the only species on earth to have developed physiologically (bio-genetically) for sexual pleasure. The design of the human body is sculpted for it. This is well-explained in The Naked Ape, by Desmond Morris.
Sustenance secured by money (or trade and bartering prior) were needs in the past that women had to acquire through men. Money (or sustenance) was the male trade-off value for sex that has now been subverted by allowing women access to men’s equivalent value/power without women compromising their own. The government and big corporations have replaced men and this has been done by use of men’s own resources extracted through taxation (government funding of programs/polices as Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action).
And of course this human dynamic would not be taking place if sex were not only a need but a very important one to men. Dishonesty is very important (key) in continuing this imbalance–female power dynamic. If sex is recognized as a male need then this will allow it to be acknowledged as proof that women are able to tease and deprive men (female accountability) something they need from which deprivation women receive a tremendous power, including abuse of that power to that of condemnation if female terms are not strictly followed. (It could even be considered crimes against humanity, that is only if men were considered human beings compared to women in the first place.)
The priority of any organism/species is to reproduce, so that of all things is the priority of all needs. And this is well-demonstrated in women’s ability (exclusive power). Women pride themselves in their sexual power and ability to get what they want through sex which ability would not exist if sex were not a need to men. Yet women complain about the very thing they brag about and sculpt themselves to be so successful at, even to the point of criminalizing men for merely enacting their part in the sexual process that women more often than not initiate via visual means (men are visually stimulated porn is self-evient of this), not different than is done by them through porn (Only Fans) and other forms of prostitution, but with better intentions. This is to make sure that they are not being held accountable for themselves and can pit both ends of their advantages/power ends against the middle, even ironically including a victim status. This deliberate female denial secures yet a higher level of power, making them above reproach. To even talk about it (question this power) is misogyny. This is why to challenge rape and subjective rape laws (subject to female discretion) and the fallse allegations of rape carry so much clout with women and the chivalrous men who serve them and have served/protected them. (Due to such extreme cultural bias, it’s men who need more protection compared to women.)
A male in prison who fears he may be raped doesn’t solicit for the very thing he fears. This further demonstrates the low status men possess in society and how women possess power so strong that it is allowed to defy logic upon which right and wrong are based. Victim power is recieved through women’s supposed fear of being raped. And due to female bias this sale is still bought by many men who are apologists for other men they have been groomed from boyhood to hate. (Nothing works better for women than to have men pitted against each other—eg. hence, the chivalrous white knight simp.)
Also Read: Beta Male/White Knights: Making – Full Tutorial DIY At Home
The illogical mindset is that even if a person is living in misery and abuse, due to being deprived something necessary to resolve that problem, as long as that person’s other needs are met means that disqualifies that entity from being a need? Both feminists and religious trad/cons unite in a combined front when it comes to not considering sex a need for men. Female power uses against men and religion denouncing sex other than for reproduction and failing to see reality.
Misandrists claim that sex is not a need to men, touting because men don’t die from not having it. A person my not die from a debilitating disease but life is miserable due to the effect. Women don’t die from being raped either, but they also will commit suicide due to experiencing that as men do from sexual deprivation. People being deprived food as when imprisoned may still live too, but that is no measurement of food not being a need to them. A man is unhealthy who is deprived sex no less which is why men can be manipulated, entrapped and exploited through their sexuality by women. (Womanizer/Manizer—it’s much worse than that.) The difference is that sex is an exclusive need to men over women which is self-evident by the imbalance that allows women to commonly violated men through such means with laws made to uphold such cruel and sadistic acts by women. Any such need if exclusive to women as important as sexual fulfillment is to men constitutes a major issue. We all know this, but many are dishonest about it due to threatening women’s exclusive sexual power oever men.
What counter power compares? What power have men had that even closely compares? Money. Indeed, Equal Eployment Opportunity took away the balance. Money was exchanged for sex. Thus, if women continue to manipulate men by sex, to balance out the effect, they will need to have EEO taken away from them due to their selfishness. Although it still takes a money exchange, given current conditions, prostitution at a minimum, needs to be legalized.
When a woman sexually teases a man there is no urge more intense for him, and many women, sadistic as they are, know this and use it as a weapon per their misandric ways. Yet, we don’t hold them accountable for it per law, with laws made to even accommodate them! Although they sculpt themselves to do it, women are ignorant and don’t realize what they are doing? When we tease a starving dog by food don’t we know then what we are doing? When it comes to men, men rate as second to dogs!
Alan Millard continues to be a prominent men’s equality advocate since the early ’80s. He began writing his first book, Equality: A Man’s Claim, in the Spring of 1983. He has been thereafter continually affiliated with the major men’s rights organizations and has contributed many articles, radio, and some television broadcasts. His work includes research conducted through his graduate and doctoral coursework and knowledge acquired through his independent studies and colleague associations as a university professor. He heads the group Men’s Equality on Facebook. He is the author of three books addressing men’s equality concerns. His most recent book, A Flaw From Within: How Women’s Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society, is available through Amazon.