This thing happening with Will Smith illustrates very well how men are raised from boyhood to serve women, due to a female superiority status, as to even define manhood. Once this female ownership is sculpted into the male psyche, women, as men’s puppet masters–an applicable term first used by Esther Vilar applying to men in her book, The Manipulated Man–have the ability to pit one man against the other to get their way, even to satisfy their sadistic ego by implementing violence as in the Will Smith assault of Chris Rock example. Boys need to be raised differently, defined in their own right as men rather than as mere disposable pawns for women pitted against each other by women as well as by a government occupied by men as mere figureheads bound to serve women. (And by the way, that is not a patriarchy. Wars are conducted in the same manner.) What’s sad as a result is that men take pride in their disposable, utility, pawn existence as ‘men’. This is a form of what we can identify as toxic behavior, and if that behavior is exclusively held by men in a female-sculpted male, toxic masculinity, no different than toxic femininity applies to women in the form of feminism or traditional misandry commonly referred to as chivalry and the female servitude demands on the female’s behalf.
Once under this poor excuse for manhood (female ownership), a man is bound to a servitude role for women defining his manhood to which he is held to conformity by shaming tactics–“What kind of a man strikes a woman?” Answer: The same kind of character held by a woman who strikes a man–same quality, same character, with the only difference being the female superiority mindset or female ego that a man is bound to serve.
Men, bound a blind servitude to women, often commit crimes for women, as demonstrated in the Will Smith example. If they can, they will often even take the rap for women. If ever convicted for the same crime a man commits, due to her higher status, a woman usually gets a lighter sentence when prosecuted. Male police officers, often under the chivalry code of conduct (favoring and serving women as ‘real men’), will often arrest men instead of the women involved. This will often occur even if the women are guilty too with the voluntary endorsement (self-hate/sacrifice), or not, of the men involved, due to them also being sculpted to ‘take it like a man’ and to serve women. They will even, as chivalrous schmucks, say it was their fault, protecting a woman from being held accountable for the consequences of her actions. Don’t we see this as a common standard anyway? Does this Will Smith example not correspond to practically all aspects of our human society now? Do you finally get it?! As the title of my latest book conveys, this is a flaw from within.
Alan Millard continues to be a prominent men’s equality advocate since the early ’80s. He began writing his first book, Equality: A Man’s Claim, in the Spring of 1983. He has been thereafter continually affiliated with the major men’s rights organizations and has contributed many articles, radio, and some television broadcasts. His work includes research conducted through his graduate and doctoral coursework and knowledge acquired through his independent studies and colleague associations as a university professor. He heads the group Men’s Equality on Facebook. He is the author of three books addressing men’s equality concerns. His most recent book, A Flaw From Within: How Women’s Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society, is available through Amazon.
1 thought on “Will Smith assaulting Chris Rock Illustrates how men are defined by a servitude to women”